Author Archives: Emily Conover

Call for Professional Development Day proposals

Have a great idea for a panel, workshop or other professional development event? With the help of DCSWA, you can make it happen. We’re currently looking for ideas for events for Professional Development Day, to take place this summer.

Send a proposal with your idea (<300 words) to president@dcswa.org by March 31.

While we’re hoping to hold Professional Development Day at least partially in person, there may be room for virtual events as well.

Proposal to amend DCSWA’s bylaws: Cast your vote!

The DCSWA board is proposing several updates to DCSWA’s bylaws, with the goal of bringing the bylaws into accordance with the board’s current practices, adding detail in cases where the bylaws are unclear, and allowing for more inclusivity in the organization. DCSWA’s bylaws have not been updated since at least 2006, and the board believes it’s time for refresh.

We are presenting these suggested changes to the membership for a full vote. If a majority of the voters approve the changes, the changes will be implemented.

The bylaws do not lay out any process for amending the bylaws. Therefore, the DCSWA board has agreed upon the above process for amending bylaws in this case. The changes to the bylaws, if approved, include the addition of a section about amending the bylaws, which will be used in future cases when bylaw changes are proposed.

One additional notable change creates a new membership tier for student members.

Current bylaws are located here. Below we present the amended bylaws with changes noted in red, and with explanations for those changes italicized in gray.

Cast your vote here! You must be a DCSWA member in good standing to vote. Voting closes on March 29 at 5pm EDT.

Bylaws of the D.C. Science Writers Association

  1. Membership.
    1. Membership is open to those anyone who considers themselves himself or herself a science writers or communicators. [This change makes DCSWA inclusive to those who do not use him/her pronouns, and those who communicate science primarily via video, audio or other non-written means.]
    2. Members shall abide by the DCSWA code of conduct. Failure to do so will result in consequences to be determined by the DCSWA Board of Directors. [This is already a condition of membership. This change merely encodes this requirement in the bylaws.]
    3. Membership shall consist of two classes: Member and Student Member. Student members must be enrolled in a school or degree-granting program. [This addition would create a new class of membership for students, which would be provided at a discounted rate.]
  2. Officers.
    1. Officers shall include : President, Vice President, Treasurer, Deputy Treasurer, Secretary, Membership Chair, Social Media Chair and Social Events Chair. The President may appoint someone to preside in his or her their absence. [Officially adds two officer positions that are already important roles on the DCSWA board. Includes those who do not use him/her pronouns.]
    2. Officers will be elected by a vote of the Board of Directors.
    3. The Vice President shall serve as President in the following term. [Officially states a protocol already in place.]
    4. Elections will be annual. Officers will serve April 1 through March 31.
  3. Board of Directors.
    1. The board shall consist of 10 to 20 members.
    2. Any mMembers may nominate themselves or any other member to serve on the board. [Clarifies that self-nominations to the board are accepted.]
    3. A succeeding board will be elected by a vote of the current board.
    4. Elections will be annual. Board members will serve April 1 through March 31.
    5. When possible, board members are expected to serve three consecutive terms before retiring from the board. [Clarifies expectations for board members that are already in place informally.]
    6. Board members may return to the board after a period of retirement. [Clarifies a practice that is already in place informally.]
    7. If 20 or more members submit a petition requesting a special election, board members will be elected by a vote of the full membership. Anyone nominated for the board will be named on the ballot.
    8. The board shall meet approximately monthly at least four times a year. [Updates bylaws to match current meeting schedule.]
    9. At least half of the board members must be present for a quorum.
    10. Decisions will be determined by simple majority of board members present.
  1. Board responsibilities.
    1. The board shall set annual dues.
    2. The board shall appoint members to coordinate specific activities.
    3. The board shall be responsible for maintaining the financial health of the organization, and assuring that all funds are spent in accordance with the conditions of incorporation.
    4. Board members are expected to attend meetings, to assist with planning major DCSWA events, and to plan at least one additional event per term. [Clarifies expectations for board members that are already in place informally.]
  2. Amendments
    1. The board can propose amendments to the bylaws, which must then be submitted to the membership for approval by a majority of the votes cast after a voting period of at least two weeks. [Provides a procedure for amending the bylaws.]

Science is Sweet! DCSWA’s Great Holiday Treat Contest

As much as the DCSWA community wanted to celebrate the end of 2021 in person, the holiday party is virtual again this year. We miss gathering with you and sharing scrumptious food together, and that sweet sentiment sparked an idea.

December weather ushers in no shortage of pastries for every taste and every holiday. There’s only one thing that could make such a feast better: science. What if every snowflake cookie were a fractal? What if you could honor pioneering geologists in gingerbread house or cupcake form? Now, you can. Inspired by The Open Notebook’s vaunted Peeps Diorama Contest, and in the spirit of a holiday bake-off, DCSWA is proud to present a festive treat decorating contest! 

This contest is going to be all about how the entries look and not how they taste. You don’t need to celebrate a December holiday to participate. You don’t have to be a veteran baker. You don’t even have to make the baked goods yourself. You just have to love science and want to spend time experimenting with pastries, frosting, and craft supplies, whether they’re made from scratch or bought at the grocery store.

Contest Rules:

Sweet baked holiday treats should be decorated to depict something related to science. That could mean a scientist, a scientific concept, a big event in science history, or a scene depicting science in action. 

Entries must be made by a DCSWA member in good standing. DCSWAns’ family members and kids are encouraged to participate.

New entries only. As for a contest that would be held at an in-person holiday party, we ask for fresh creations, please. 

The competition will have two categories: one for pastries and treats that are store-bought, and one for treats baked at home. Baked goods need not be made of gingerbread or other holiday-specific ingredients. When entering, choose the category that you feel best describes your project. 

Non-edible craft supplies may be used to decorate treats, but the foundation of the entry itself must be something edible, such as rugelach or cupcakes. 

Those with dietary restrictions may submit a food item of any sort that aligns with their needs.

DCSWA reserves the right to disqualify entries deemed libelous or inappropriate.

How to enter

Fill out DCSWA’s entry form on Google Forms. You must sign in with a Google Account to access the form. DCSWA cannot see any login or password information. 

If you do not have a Google Account, please email your entry to president@dcswa.org.

This is the information required to enter:

  • Photo of the project
  • Category (store-bought or homemade)
  • Title of the creation
  • Brief description of how it relates to science (max 150 words)
  • Names of the people who worked on the project 

Entries will be accepted until 10:00 PM ET on Sunday December 12th. 

Selection of winners and honorable mentions:

DCSWA members will select the contest winners by popular vote. Members need not be registered for the DCSWA holiday party in order to vote.

Members will vote for one winner in the “store bought” category and one in the “baked at home” category. When casting their vote, members may also suggest honorable mentions. DCSWA will select honorable mentions at its discretion. 

Voting begins on December 13th and ends at the holiday party on December 16th.

Prizes:

Winners will get first pick of DCSWA’s special prize stash. Each winner will select one book or board game as their prize. Winners and honorable mentions will each receive a snazzy prize certificate and eternal bragging rights.  

Everyone who registers for the party will get entered to win a chance to pick from DCSWA’s grab-bag of science-themed prizes. DCSWA will mail prizes directly to the address winners specify.

Permissions:

By submitting an entry, you give DCSWA permission to use your name and the photo of your creation on its website and on its social media channels. You also certify that you have the right to grant DCSWA permission to use the photo. 

Tips and How-Tos:

If you’ve never decorated desserts before and don’t know where to start, the internet is your friend. The Gluesticks Blog’s cookie decorating tutorial is designed for kids and adults. We also love Borderlands Bakery’s tutorial on icing because it’s easy to follow and includes public health messaging we can all get behind.

Winners Announced for 12th Annual DCSWA Newsbrief Award

For Immediate Release
April 2, 2021

Contact: Christine Dell’Amore
rueparadis@gmail.com

Winners Announced for 12th Annual DCSWA Newsbrief Award

Washington, D.C.—A story about a hummingbird that can nearly freeze itself solid and a video about the quest for a more diverse human genome reference library have won the twelfth annual D.C. Science Writers Association’s Newsbrief Awards.

Longform journalism often gets our accolades, but short pieces are the true workhorses of science communication. In the spirit of recognizing these unsung works of excellence, we have been offering the Newsbrief Awards since 2009. 

For the 2020 award, two separate panels of distinguished science writers judged more than 50 entries divided into two categories, Writing and Multimedia.

In the Writing category, Jonathan Lambert won for his story “This hummingbird survives cold nights by nearly freezing itself solid,” which ran in Science News. “This short piece provides a fascinating look into the black metaltail hummingbird’s ingenious solution to surviving the cold,” judges said.

Lambert is a staff writer at Science News, where he covers the biological sciences with a special focus on biodiversity and environmental issues. The 2018 AAAS Mass Media Fellowship convinced Lambert to shift from doing science to writing about it, and he landed at Science News after stints writing for Quanta Magazine, NPR, and Nature News.

A Writing honorable mention was awarded to Michael Greshko for his story “Walking back in time, in a volcano’s shadow,” published in National Geographic magazine. Judges said the story is “a lesson in how to write short.”

Michael Greshko is a writer and producer on National Geographic‘s science desk, where he covers everything from dinosaurs to dark matter and disease. He also has written for publications including MIT Technology Review, Inside Science, and NOVA Next. He lives in Washington, D.C.

Another Writing honorable mention went to Asher Jones for her story “Plastic waste forms huge, deadly masses in camel guts,” which appeared in Science News. Jones is a science journalist based in Arlington, Virginia. She has a Ph.D. in entomology, but enjoys writing about insects more than studying them. She was a 2020 AAAS Mass Media Fellow at Voice of America and the spring 2021 intern at The Scientist. Her writing has also appeared in Slate, Science News, and Science News for Students.

Jones also won a second honorable mention in the Multimedia category for her radio piece, “New app identifies mosquitoes by buzzing sound,” which aired on Voice of America.

In the Multimedia category, Prabarna Ganguly and Harriet Bailey earned top prize for their video “The Human Pangenome,” published by the National Human Genome Research Institute. “Explaining DNA is never easy, so I was impressed by their mastery of blending animation and strong writing to effectively tell a story,” said one judge. 

Ganguly is a neuroscientist and science writer based in Washington, D.C. She currently works at the National Institutes of Health as a writer-editor, disseminating genomics for the public. She completed her Ph.D. in psychology (with a focus in behavioral neuroscience) from Northeastern University in 2018.

Bailey is a producer/director turning science into award-winning factual content for TV, film, and animation. From gibbons in the Bornean rainforest to quantum computers in Bristol and to the far reaches of the solar system (Pluto!), she has collaborated with the BBC, National Geographic, PBS, Discovery, Al Jazeera, and IMAX to bring scientists and their discoveries to screens. Working with Massive Science, she has produced acclaimed science animations alongside NIH, MIT and ASU.

Another honorable mention in the Multimedia category is awarded to Theresa Machemer for her video “Good news: daffodils are the worst,” which aired on SciShow.

Machemer is a freelance science writer. Her work tends to focus on biology and medicine, though she can’t help but write about technology, history, and PEZ dispensers along the way. She is a digital contributor at Smithsonian and her work also appears in National Geographic and SciShow. She studied science writing and biology at MIT.

DCSWA plans to celebrate the winners in an upcoming virtual ceremony, whose date will be announced soon. Teams that won top awards will receive $300 and a trophy; those awarded honorable mentions will receive certificates.

DCSWA members were eligible to submit entries published between January 1 and December 31, 2020. The D.C. Science Writers Association is an organization of more than 500 science reporters, editors, authors, and public information officers based in the national capital area. Details on how to enter the 2021 Newsbrief Award will appear on the DCSWA website by the end of the year.

Photos of the winners are available upon request.

######

DCSWA Condemns Racism and Hate Towards Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders

Earlier this month, eight people, six of whom were women of Asian descent, were killed in a mass shooting in Atlanta, during a time when Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities have experienced rising racism and violence. This latest tragedy is part of a longer, persistent history of prejudice. 

The DCSWA Board stands with the Asian American and Pacific Islander communities and denounces violence and racism against people of Asian descent.

We call on our members to commit to racial justice and empowering AAPI communities in science and communication.

Throughout the coronavirus pandemic, politicians have repeatedly used racist terms to scapegoat innocent communities for the virus. Anti-Asian hashtags on social media increased ten-fold after then-President Donald Trump tweeted an offensive hashtag in March 2020, echoing language that he has used repeatedly since. Over the last year, Asian Americans reported the largest year-over-year increase in online harassment compared with other groups, according to a survey by the Anti-Defamation League. 

Violence against AAPIs has also escalated. The Center for the Study of Hate & Extremism reported that anti-Asian hate crime spiked by 149% in 2020. From March 19, 2020 to February 28, 2021, Stop AAPI Hate received 3,795 hate incident reports, which likely represents only a fraction of the number of incidents that actually occur. Sexism also compounds upon racism: Asian American women reported incidents 2.3 times more frequently than Asian-American men.

But hate and discrimination against Asians is not new: anti-Asian prejudice has deep roots in longstanding biases that have persisted since the earliest immigrants arrived in America. The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 is often seen as the first major law to restrict immigration to our country and, as the name indicates, specifically targeted the Chinese. The Page Act of 1875 effectively barred Chinese women from entry by branding them as sex workers.

Though these laws were eventually repealed, the prejudices underlying them have lingered till today. Asians Americans are often seen as “forever foreigners”, a percieved status that helped justify the Japanese internment during World War II and fueled Islamophobia towards Muslim Americans and prejudice towards South Asian Americans following the 9/11 terrorist attacks. 

At the same time, Asian Americans are considered “model minorities”, a stereotype that has been used to drive a wedge between Asians and other historically oppressed groups and fails to accurately represent the diversity of experiences of a heterogeneous population originating from more than 40 Asian countries. Indeed, Asian American groups vary widely in their education and income levels: the group has the highest level of income inequality. Plus, data has shown that despite higher educational attainment Asian Americans continue to face barriers to advancement and may be the least likely group promoted to management or leadership. 

We know that many in the DCSWA community have experienced great pain this past year, which is why we must lift one another up in standing against race-based hate in all forms every time we see it. We call on all our members to educate themselves on how anti-Asian racism affects their work and workplaces. These biases appear in both science and in journalism, and it is imperative we acknowledge and address these prejudices within ourselves and the organizations we serve. 

As science writers, we must be aware of how racism against Asian-Americans affects scientists. Asian scientists are subject to microaggressions in academic and laboratory environments just as in other workplaces. Asian professors and university instructors are given lower rankings by their students. Asian-American women in STEM careers, who face discrimination due to both race and gender, lag behind other groups on a variety of metrics, including the percentage with tenure. Scientists of Chinese descent in the US face particular concerns of being racially profiled, wrongfully prosecuted, or having their visas revoked.

As communicators, we need to be aware of the many ways the mainstream media failed the shooting victims in Atlanta. Although the gunman deliberately targeted businesses owned by people of Asian descent, the official statement of the police and initial media reports took the shooter’s denials of racial motive at face value and focused on his identity instead of the victims’. These missteps reflect broader journalism shortcomings in covering the AAPI communities, which receive relatively little media attention compared to white Americans, Black Americans, and Latinos. The relative dearth of Asian American faces and voices across many forms of media and entertainment prompted a 2018 New York Times article to ask “Why Do Asian-Americans Remain Largely Unseen in Film and Television?”

We can and must do better: The Asian American Journalists Association Broadcast Advisory Council “urges newsrooms to empower their AAPI journalists by recognizing both the unique value they bring to the coverage of the Atlanta shootings and the invisible labor they regularly take on, especially in newsrooms where they are severely underrepresented.”

We have curated a resource guide for those in need of support or who are interested in improving the diversity of journalism and science communication, becoming an ally, and providing aid to members of the AAPI communities.

As stated in our code of conduct, DCSWA is dedicated to providing a safe and welcoming experience for everyone, regardless of gender, gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race, ethnicity, age, national origin, or religion. DCSWA does not tolerate harassment of members in any form.

The DCSWA Board will continue to serve all our members and will continue discussing programming and resources around elevating diversity and inclusion. We would especially like to hear from members to guide our next steps forward. Please don’t hesitate to reach out to us via email during this time at president@dcswa.org.

In solidarity,

— DCSWA Board

Home

The D.C. Science Writers Association is a group of journalists, writers, public information officers (PIOs), and audio and video producers who cover breaking research, science and technology. Our events bring together science writers for socializing, networking, science-based tours and events, and professional development workshops. The D.C. Science Writers Association is dedicated to providing a safe and welcoming experience for everyone, regardless of gender, gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race, age, national origin, or religion. DCSWA does not tolerate harassment of members in any form.